Judge Awards Family $200,000 for Dog Shooting

Life With Dogs is reader-supported. We may earn a small commission through products purchased using links on this page.

12.21.14 - dog shot

A Maryland Appeals Court judge handed down a verdict awarding emotional damages payment be given to a family whose dog was shot by a deputy.  The original verdict stated that the officers did intend to cause harm, and based on that the family was allowed to collect $200,000.

The decision is a shift in legal precedent.  Usually, pets are considered by the court to be “property” and only worth their “fair market value.”

The 42-page court opinion decreased the original amount the family had sought by $400,000.  The findings included that involved the officers in question trespassing into the family’s home.

Deputy First Class Timothy Brooks and Deputy First Class Nathan Rector were the ones requesting the appeal.  In April of 2012, a jury found that Brooks had violated the rights of Roger and Sandi Jenkins.  Brooks shot their chocolate Lab Brandi while searching for the couple’s son, who was wanted on a civil matter.

It was also decided that both deputies had violated the Jenkins’ rights by entering their home without permission.  The deputies entered their home after they had left to take Brandi to a vet in an attempt to save her life.

The first verdict gave $620,000 to the family, which had been adjusted down to $607,500 due to a cap placed on how much can be charged for vet bills.  One cannot bill for more than $7,500.

After the appeals process, the total dollar amount awarded to the Jenkins was $400,000.  Even though there’s been a reduction in the amount given, the decision has opened up possibilities of collecting damages for killed pets in the future, which was not the norm before.

 

139 thoughts on “Judge Awards Family $200,000 for Dog Shooting”

  1. :'( so sad for them to collect that amount the judge had to be a dog owner or dog lover other wise they wouldn’t give a damn n to the family sorry for your lost :'(

    Reply
  2. I hope of comes out of that officers Retirement account.. No taxpayer dollars should be used for something like this where intentional harm is provable.
    I feel so horrible for the family. No amount of money can replace the furry family member, but this is precedent setting and maybe Law Enforcement will think twice about shooting in the future. Man or animal…..

    Reply

Leave a Comment