You Can Help Move Oregon “Tethering Bill” Into Law

Life With Dogs is reader-supported. We may earn a small commission through products purchased using links on this page.

If you live in Oregon, today is a good day to reach out to your state Senators.  HB 2783, has moved out of the Oregon House to the Senate.The law provides limits on how long a dog can be chained in one place or left exposed to the elements. The “tethering bill” passed out of the Oregon Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday with unanimous approval. That means it moves on to the full Senate today.

House Bill 2783 would make it illegal to tie a dog or other domestic animal in a fixed place for tn or more hours in a twenty-four hour period or leave a dog outside exposed to the elements. Violators will see fines up to $1000.

So why should Oregon dog lovers call in now? There is currently no vote scheduled in the Senate. The bill has enjoyed bipartisan support as it moved quickly through the House Agricultural and Natural Resources Committee and won by a two-thirds vote in the Oregon House. But it is sitting still until it gets scheduled to be heard by the Senate. If and hopefully when the Senate adopts it, it would have to be signed by Gov. John Kitzhaber before it becomes law.

Under the bill, dogs and other domestic animals could not stay tethered to a fixed object for more than 10 hours in a 24-hour period. The provision is extended to 15 hours in a 24-hour period if the tether is attached to a running line or pulley system.

Is this a great bill? No. The exemptions and exceptions actually make this bill just a step or two better than no law but it is a step forward. Here is why this law is nowhere near really good:

  • Animals would have to be on reasonably long tethers that won’t tangle and not be on a collar that pinches or chokes the animal when pulled.
  • The rules don’t apply if the owner or possessor remains in the physical presence of the tethered animal, or in a campground or recreation area.
  • Dogs used for protecting livestock, dog sledding and hunting are exempt and all dogs would be exempt during transportation.

 

On the other hand here are some of the better provisions of the bill:

  • It would require shelters such as dog houses or barns that would keep the domestic animal out of the elements. Shelters do not include in or under vehicles, crates or carriers or shelters with wire or chain-link floors.
  • The bill also would require those shelters to contain adequate bedding to remain dry, reasonably clean and at normal body temperature.

 

So why is it important for everyone to stop the chaining or tethering of dogs?  It is well accepted among dog trainers and behaviorists, as well as The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Veterinary Medical Association, that the best way to make a dog mean and dangerous is by chaining him or her. All of these groups warn that chained dogs are about eight times more likely to bite. Chained dogs are also more likely to escape, run at large, and pose a threat to themselves and the public. Tethered dogs are also at greater risks from other animals and humans, including mischievous children and evil adults.

The best law would be one that outlaws tethering but that would be extremely difficult to get past some well-healed organizations. But maybe we can get this bill into law as a first step towards a more humane and safer future for us all.

11 thoughts on “You Can Help Move Oregon “Tethering Bill” Into Law”

  1. Please consider banning chaining dogs! This is inhumane and cruel. More people need to speak up for the animals’ rights!!

    Reply
  2. Don’t leave dogs tied up all the time. Don’t cage them either all the time. Pay attention to them and give them a good life. Why have a pet and disregard it’s feelings. Walk them and play with them. How would you like to be chained up?

    Reply
    • I agree! Don’t have a pet if you aren’t going to give it the time and love it needs!

      Reply
  3. I DO GET THE UPSET.HOWEVER THERE IS SOME DOGS .ONES THAT ARE ABUSED OR LARGE BULL DOGS.THAT A CHAIN IS SAFE. I KNOW MY DOG WON’T BITE ME OR MINE. HOWEVER SHE WILL BITE OTHERS. SO TO KEEP HER SAFE ND MY FRIENDS I KEEP HER IN A SAFE PLACE FOR ALL.
    MY DOG WAS SHOT AT ND LEFT FOR DEAD. I DID NOT BUY THESE DOGS. YET MY LORD PLACED THESE TWO LOVABLE DOGS WITH ME. I WILL NOT KILL THEM NOR ALLOW THEM TO HARM ANY ONE. BUT THIS LAW. IS GOOD FOR LITTLE TEA CUPS OR WINNIE DOGS. BUT COUNTRY DOGS, HUNTING DOGS ND OTHER LARGE DOGS .A CHAIN IS A TEMP WHEN . I CAN’T HOLD THEM ALL THE TIME.
    AS FAR AS THE PULLING THING. MY DOG GETS THIS MARK FROM PULLING OUT OF HER COLLAR.THIS HAPPENS WHEN SHE WET OR WHEN SHE IS RUNNING AND PLAYING. YET HER PLAY IS HARDER THEN OTHERS SO THE MARKS COMES WHEN HER COLLAR IS USED TO CORRECT HER PULLING.
    THESE ARE PET BUT THESE ARE ALSO PET THAT CAN DO HARM. SO YOUR LAW WILL LEAD .JUST KNOW SOME ONE HAS TO DO WHAT THEY NEED TO DO.

    Reply
  4. I disagree with the chaining of dogs, these leaves the animals subject to abuse. When I was a child, my grandfather chained his husky out in the yard and it was beaten with poles by two local children and lost trust for most people afterwards. A responsible dog owner can take care of his or her pet without chaining it to a post.

    Reply

Leave a Comment